« Political Signs Observed | Main | Against the Idea of "the White Male Writer" »

October 14, 2015

Comments

LFC

I agree Brooks is basically partisan, w an occasional veneer of olympian judiciousness. I don't read him except on v rare occasion, but his broadcast (radio etc) appearances make it clear.

Re Coates: I heard C. Robin's speech at a conference this past wkend in which he delivered a critique of Sunstein and Coates (specifically 'Between the World and Me'). I think Corey is eventually going to post the text of the speech somewhere (linking at his blog and/or Crooked Timber), but I'm not sure.

bianca steele

Hi LFC,

It's great that you got to go to the USIH conference. I usually only get to follow discussion of it on their blog. Are you going to write something about this on your blog?

(Sorry about requiring a login. I was getting too many spam comments and didn't like the idea of letting some sneaker reseller juice their link count for the day or two it took me to see them.)

Howlatpluto.blogspot.com

Bianca,
I understand why you require a login, but for me it was a bit of a pain. I tried to do it through Blogger which didn't work, then WordPress which didn't work, then Blogger again, which worked. At some point in there I cleared the browser cache, which might have helped, but anyway. (I suppose most people probably use either FB or Twitter, but I don't have an account on either one.)

Short answer to question: I don't think I'll write about Corey's speech on my blog b/c I think eventually it's going to be covered elsewhere. I did go to some other stuff at the conference but haven't decided whether to write about it. Have a bunch of semi-legible notes, plus what I chose to go
to is prob. not of that wide interest. Plus at this conference it's papers-in-process, not always finished products, and I hesitate to refer to them too specifically for that reason.

There was one interesting moment during the question period in CR's talk when one questioner, w/o identifying himself, asked CR if there were some public intellectuals he thought *did* deserve the label (or something to that effect). CR's answer began with the word "you." Turned out the questioner, whose name was never actually mentioned, was Andrew Sullivan, which became fairly obvious in the course of the exchange, but I think even in that au courant audience a least a few people were left in the dark. The usual identify-yourself-before-asking-question rule was not in effect. This is all of no importance, of course, just gets filed under 'anecdotes'.
-LFC

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Blog powered by Typepad